Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Claritas Community Behavior Dashboard

Claritas Community Behavior Indicators provide a broad understanding of community behaviors across a variety of categories including but not limited to health care access (such as insurance and telemedicine data) and the social environment (such as households with internet access). The default location is Pima County, however, you may use the dropdown to choose other locations such as census places (e.g. Tuscon) and zip codes within the county.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Pima

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (1.4%), Pima has a value of 1.4%.
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Pima has a value of 1.4%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (1.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.3%).
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (8.5%), Pima has a value of 8.7%.
AZ Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Pima has a value of 8.7%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (8.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

Current Value:
10.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (10.6%), Pima has a value of 10.9%.
AZ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7%), Pima has a value of 10.9%.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (10.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups

73.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 73.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.5%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (73.3%), Pima has a value of 73.4% which is higher and better.
AZ Value
(73.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (74.2%), Pima has a value of 73.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (73.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (75.2%).
Prior Value
(75.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Adults with Health Insurance: 18+

Current Value:
84.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 84.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.1%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 84.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (84.8%), Pima has a value of 84.1% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(84.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.9%), Pima has a value of 84.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (84.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.2%).
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults with HMO Health Insurance

Current Value:
14.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (15.2%), Pima has a value of 14.8%.
AZ Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.2%), Pima has a value of 14.8%.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (14.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:
12.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (11.9%), Pima has a value of 12.8%.
AZ Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9%), Pima has a value of 12.8%.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (12.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

Current Value:
20.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (18.9%), Pima has a value of 20.0%.
AZ Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Pima has a value of 20.0%.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (20.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults with Military Health Insurance

Current Value:
4.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (4.4%), Pima has a value of 4.5%.
AZ Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Pima has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (4.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults with Other Health Insurance

Current Value:
6.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (6.3%), Pima has a value of 6.4%.
AZ Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.2%), Pima has a value of 6.4%.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (6.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults with POS Health Insurance

Current Value:
1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (1.8%), Pima has a value of 1.7%.
AZ Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.9%), Pima has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (1.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (1.8%).
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults with PPO Health Insurance

Current Value:
30.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (32.4%), Pima has a value of 30.9%.
AZ Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Pima has a value of 30.9%.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (30.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (31.3%).
Prior Value
(31.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services

12.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (11.8%), Pima has a value of 12.1%.
AZ Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Pima has a value of 12.1%.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (12.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Households that Received Maternity Care Services

5.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (5.9%), Pima has a value of 5.5%.
AZ Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Pima has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (5.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room

28.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (27.9%), Pima has a value of 28.2%.
AZ Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Pima has a value of 28.2%.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (28.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (28.6%).
Prior Value
(28.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility

25.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (25.8%), Pima has a value of 25.4%.
AZ Value
(25.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.9%), Pima has a value of 25.4%.
US Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (25.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (24.8%).
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services

10.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (11.1%), Pima has a value of 10.3%.
AZ Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Pima has a value of 10.3%.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (10.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet

31.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (31.6%), Pima has a value of 31.6%.
AZ Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Pima has a value of 31.6%.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (31.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (34.2%).
Prior Value
(34.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Adults with Internet Access

Current Value:
90.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (90.5%), Pima has a value of 90.0% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(90.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.7%), Pima has a value of 90.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (90.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (95.2%).
Prior Value
(95.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Households with a Computer

Current Value:
87.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.9%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (87.6%), Pima has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(87.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.2%), Pima has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (87.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (86.5%).
Prior Value
(86.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Households with a Smartphone

Current Value:
83.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 83.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.7%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 83.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (84.2%), Pima has a value of 83.6% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(84.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.7%), Pima has a value of 83.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (83.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (81.8%).
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol

Current Value:
17.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (17.2%), Pima has a value of 17.6%.
AZ Value
(17.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.1%), Pima has a value of 17.6%.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (17.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure

24.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (24.0%), Pima has a value of 24.8%.
AZ Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.4%), Pima has a value of 24.8%.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.8%).
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist

Current Value:
14.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (13.5%), Pima has a value of 14.0%.
AZ Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2%), Pima has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression

14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (14.2%), Pima has a value of 14.1%.
AZ Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Pima has a value of 14.1%.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (14.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (8.8%), Pima has a value of 8.7%.
AZ Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Pima has a value of 8.7%.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (8.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days

Current Value:
44.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 44.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 45.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.6%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (44.1%), Pima has a value of 44.7% which is higher and worse.
AZ Value
(44.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Pima has a value of 44.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pima Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home

Current Value:
77.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 77.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.4%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (77.2%), Pima has a value of 77.2%.
AZ Value
(77.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.0%), Pima has a value of 77.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (77.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (72.0%).
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

40.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 40.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.1%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 40.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (40.8%), Pima has a value of 40.1% which is lower and better.
AZ Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.4%), Pima has a value of 40.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (40.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (40.6%).
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
50.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 50.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.3%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 50.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (50.8%), Pima has a value of 50.1% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(50.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.2%), Pima has a value of 50.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(51.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (50.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (49.7%).
Prior Value
(49.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist

Current Value:
15.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (16.0%), Pima has a value of 15.8%.
AZ Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Pima has a value of 15.8%.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (15.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:
15.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (16.2%), Pima has a value of 15.5%.
AZ Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Pima has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (15.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:
66.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (66.8%), Pima has a value of 66.3% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(66.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Pima has a value of 66.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (66.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (57.3%).
Prior Value
(57.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma

Current Value:
6.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (6.6%), Pima has a value of 6.6%.
AZ Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Pima has a value of 6.6%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (6.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

Current Value:
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (1.4%), Pima has a value of 1.4%.
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Pima has a value of 1.4%.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (1.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Pima Adults who Smoke

15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (14.6%), Pima has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
AZ Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Pima has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (15.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Pima Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

5.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 5.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 5.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (5.7%), Pima has a value of 5.9% which is higher and worse.
AZ Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), Pima has a value of 5.9%.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pima Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (1.4%), Pima has a value of 1.4%.
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7%), Pima has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (1.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:
48.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 48.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (48.5%), Pima has a value of 48.3% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(48.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Pima has a value of 48.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (48.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54.0%).
Prior Value
(54.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

69.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.8%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (70.2%), Pima has a value of 69.8% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Pima has a value of 69.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (69.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (76.0%).
Prior Value
(76.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

26.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 26.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (26.4%), Pima has a value of 26.4%.
AZ Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Pima has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (26.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.2%).
Prior Value
(31.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

34.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (33.5%), Pima has a value of 34.0%.
AZ Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Pima has a value of 34.0%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (34.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (36.3%).
Prior Value
(36.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

84.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.8%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (85.1%), Pima has a value of 84.4% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Pima has a value of 84.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (84.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (85.1%).
Prior Value
(85.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Health / Women's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Health / Women's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:
15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the AZ Value (15.6%), Pima has a value of 15.3%.
AZ Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Pima has a value of 15.3%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (15.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pima value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pima

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Value
Compared to:

County: Pima Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens

37.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 37.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (37.1%), Pima has a value of 37.3% which is higher and worse.
AZ Value
(37.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6%), Pima has a value of 37.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (37.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.8%).
Prior Value
(44.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Households that Used Check Cashing, Cash Advance, or Title Loan Shops

2.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (2.4%), Pima has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
AZ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.2%), Pima has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (2.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Households with a 401k Plan

Current Value:
37.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 29.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.5%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (39.4%), Pima has a value of 37.3% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(39.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.1%), Pima has a value of 37.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (37.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (37.5%).
Prior Value
(37.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Households with a Savings Account

Current Value:
69.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.0%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pima has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the AZ Value (70.8%), Pima has a value of 69.5% which is lower and worse.
AZ Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.1%), Pima has a value of 69.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (69.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.6%).
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pima Households with Student Loan Debt

Current Value:
9.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to AZ Counties, Pima has a value of 9.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
Compared to the AZ Value (10.2%), Pima has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
AZ Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.3%), Pima has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pima (9.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.