Search for Indicators
Claritas Community Behavior Dashboard
Claritas Community Behavior Indicators provide a broad understanding of community behaviors across a variety of categories including but not limited to health care access (such as insurance and telemedicine data) and the social environment (such as households with internet access). The default location is Pima County, however, you may use the dropdown to choose other locations such as census places (e.g. Tuscon) and zip codes within the county.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value; higher than the comparison value; not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; significant change over time; no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period; lower than the previous measurement period; no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Pima
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
County: Pima Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
10.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
County: Pima Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
73.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(73.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(75.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
County: Pima Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
84.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(84.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults with HMO Health Insurance
County: Pima Adults with HMO Health Insurance
14.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
County: Pima Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
12.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
County: Pima Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
20.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults with Military Health Insurance
County: Pima Adults with Military Health Insurance
4.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults with Other Health Insurance
County: Pima Adults with Other Health Insurance
6.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults with POS Health Insurance
County: Pima Adults with POS Health Insurance
1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults with PPO Health Insurance
County: Pima Adults with PPO Health Insurance
30.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
County: Pima Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
12.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Households that Received Maternity Care Services
County: Pima Households that Received Maternity Care Services
5.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
28.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
25.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(25.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services
County: Pima Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services
10.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
31.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Adults with Internet Access
County: Pima Adults with Internet Access
90.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(90.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(95.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Households with a Computer
County: Pima Households with a Computer
87.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(87.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(86.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Households with a Smartphone
County: Pima Households with a Smartphone
83.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(84.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
17.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(17.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
24.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
County: Pima Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
14.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Value
Compared to:
14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
County: Pima Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
County: Pima Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
44.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(44.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
County: Pima Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
77.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(77.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
40.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Pima Adults who Visited a Dentist
50.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(50.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(51.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
County: Pima Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
15.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
County: Pima Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
15.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
County: Pima Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
66.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(66.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(57.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
6.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults who Smoke
County: Pima Adults who Smoke
15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Pima Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
5.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Pima Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Happy with Weight
County: Pima Adults Happy with Weight
48.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(48.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(54.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
69.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(76.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control
County: Pima Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control
26.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle
County: Pima Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle
34.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
84.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Women's Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN
County: Pima Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN
15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens
County: Pima Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens
37.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(37.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
2.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Households with a 401k Plan
County: Pima Households with a 401k Plan
37.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(39.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Households with a Savings Account
County: Pima Households with a Savings Account
69.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Households with Student Loan Debt
County: Pima Households with Student Loan Debt
9.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.