Search for Indicators
Disparities Dashboard
View all indicators that include breakout data by topics such as race/ethnicity, age and gender.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
County: Pima
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Accidental Overdose
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Accidental Overdose
40.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(37.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(30.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose
33.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
32.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(28.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Pima Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
37.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(32.7)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
16.8
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(18.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
227.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(131.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(144.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(205.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
11.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
27.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(27.7)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
17.4
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(17.1)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Pima All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima All Cancer Incidence Rate
389.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(376.6)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(390.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate
18.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,001 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
115.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(113.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(115.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Pima Cancer: Medicare Population
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
32.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2012-2016)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(30.8)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate
9.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
40.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(41.6)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Pima Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
54.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Melanoma Incidence Rate
County: Pima Melanoma Incidence Rate
32.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(28.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate
County: Pima Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate
14.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(14.6)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
9.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(9.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate
10.9
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 908 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(9.7)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
81.7
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(76.4)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(78.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Children's Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Child Mortality Rate: Under 20
County: Pima Child Mortality Rate: Under 20
56.3
Deaths per 100,000 population under 20
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,038 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(55.3)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(50.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Pima Adults 20+ with Diabetes
7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
24.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(25.1)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(29.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Pima Diabetes: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Children with a Disability
County: Pima Children with a Disability
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Pima Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with a Disability
County: Pima Persons with a Disability
15.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Pima Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Pima Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Pima Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Pima Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Family Planning
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Pima Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
13.8
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(15.3)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(14.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults with Health Insurance: 19-64
County: Pima Adults with Health Insurance: 19-64
88.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(87.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Children with Health Insurance
County: Pima Children with Health Insurance
94.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(92.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with Health Insurance
County: Pima Persons with Health Insurance
87.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(86.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima Persons with Health Insurance: All Ages
County: Pima Persons with Health Insurance: All Ages
92.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona state value.
US Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Pima Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
48.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Pima Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(25.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Pima Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
1,718
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(2,010)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1,706)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Pima Persons with an Internet Subscription
92.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
338.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(203.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(210.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(310.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
36.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(34.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(36.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
90.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(103.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(91.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(100.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
21.0
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(22.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(21.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Pima Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Pima Heart Failure: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Pima Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Pima Hypertension: Medicare Population
59.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(59.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Pima Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Pima Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
10.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(10.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(9.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Pima Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Pima Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
75.3%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(75.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Pima Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Pima Babies with Low Birthweight
8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
20.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(20.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(20.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima Depression: Medicare Population
County: Pima Depression: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Life Expectancy
County: Pima Life Expectancy
77.1
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(77.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Premature Death
County: Pima Premature Death
9,302.7
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(8,865.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Disability
32.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(32.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
14.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Pima Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Pima Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Pima Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Pima Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Hospitalization Rate due to Heat-related Illness
County: Pima Hospitalization Rate due to Heat-related Illness
35.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
County: Pima Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Pima Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
33.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Pima Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
19.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
12.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(11.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
19.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(21.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
County: Pima Death Rate due to Injuries
County: Pima Death Rate due to Injuries
104.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,037 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(95.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(80.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Pima Asthma: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima COPD: Medicare Population
County: Pima COPD: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Pima Chlamydia Incidence Rate
546.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(554.4)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(567.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Pima Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
192.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(224.1)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(202.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima HIV Diagnosis Rate
County: Pima HIV Diagnosis Rate
13.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(13.7)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima HIV Prevalence Rate
County: Pima HIV Prevalence Rate
312.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(298.8)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(310.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Pima Syphilis Incidence Rate
26.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(17.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Pima Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
30.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(26.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Pima
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Self-Reported General Health Status: Fair or Poor
County: Pima Self-Reported General Health Status: Fair or Poor
16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Self-Reported General Health Status: Good or Better
County: Pima Self-Reported General Health Status: Good or Better
83.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(83.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
7.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Foreign Born Persons
County: Pima Foreign Born Persons
12.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Total Population
County: Pima Total Population
1,063,162
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,057,476)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Veteran Population
County: Pima Veteran Population
9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Community / Public Safety
Value
Compared to:
16.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(17.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Pedestrian Collisions
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Pedestrian Collisions
3.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(3.1)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Households without a Vehicle
County: Pima Households without a Vehicle
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Pima Mean Travel Time to Work
24.5
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Pima Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Pima Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Pima Workers who Drive Alone to Work
72.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Workers who Walk to Work
County: Pima Workers who Walk to Work
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Economy / Food Insecurity
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Food Insecurity Rate
County: Pima Food Insecurity Rate
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Economy / Housing & Homes
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Overcrowded Households
County: Pima Overcrowded Households
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
51.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Pima
Economy / Income
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Median Household Income
County: Pima Median Household Income
$64,323
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
($72,581)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Per Capita Income
County: Pima Per Capita Income
$36,494
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
($38,334)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Economy / Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Pima Children Living Below Poverty Level
19.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: Pima Families Living Below Poverty Level
10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: Pima People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
County: Pima People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
17,602
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Pima People Living Below Poverty Level
14.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Pima Youth not in School or Working
County: Pima Youth not in School or Working
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Education / Educational Attainment
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Pima People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
35.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Pima People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
89.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Pima Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher
96.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(95.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Education / Student Performance K-12
Value
Compared to:
43%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(45%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(44%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima 4th Grade Students Proficient in Math
County: Pima 4th Grade Students Proficient in Math
37%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(39%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(39%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
35%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(37%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(35%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima 8th Grade Students Proficient in Math
County: Pima 8th Grade Students Proficient in Math
26%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(27%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(24%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima School Drop Outs
County: Pima School Drop Outs
8.6%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Access to Parks
County: Pima Access to Parks
64.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
