Search for Indicators
Mental Health and Substance Misuse Dashboard
This dashboard contains data for various mental health and substance misuse indicators. Please choose a location from the dropdown list below.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Pima
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults who Binge Drink
County: Pima Adults who Binge Drink
15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Adults who Drink Excessively
County: Pima Adults who Drink Excessively
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Accidental Overdose
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Accidental Overdose
40.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(37.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(30.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Opioid Overdose
33.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
32.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(28.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
County: Pima Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
25.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(21.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Pima Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
37.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(32.7)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima Health Behaviors Ranking
County: Pima Health Behaviors Ranking
3
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Liquor Store Density
County: Pima Liquor Store Density
2.8
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(3.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate
9.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Teens who have Used Methamphetamines
County: Pima Teens who have Used Methamphetamines
0.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Teens who Use Alcohol
County: Pima Teens who Use Alcohol
14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Teens who Use Marijuana
County: Pima Teens who Use Marijuana
10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Pima Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
21.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control
County: Pima Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control
26.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Pima Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
20.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(20.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(20.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Pima Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Depression: Medicare Population
County: Pima Depression: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Frequent Mental Distress
County: Pima Frequent Mental Distress
14.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Pima Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
County: Pima Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Pima Mental Health Provider Rate
229
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(182)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(216)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Pima Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Pima Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
County: Pima Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
5.2
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(4.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
84.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Self-Reported General Health Status: Good or Better
County: Pima Self-Reported General Health Status: Good or Better
83.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(83.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: Pima Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Adults who Smoke
County: Pima Adults who Smoke
15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Pima Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Pima Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
5.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Pima Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Pima Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Pima Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
40.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(41.6)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Teens who have Smoked
County: Pima Teens who have Smoked
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(12.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Pima Teens who Smoke
County: Pima Teens who Smoke
1.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
