Search for Indicators
Healthy Pima Indicators
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Public and Community Health
Food Insecurity Rate County: Pima
Food Insecurity Rate County: Pima
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Pima
Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Pima
19.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
DTaP Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
DTaP Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
93.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(89.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona state value.
US Value
(92.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Polio Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
Polio Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
94.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(90.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
MMR Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
MMR Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
93.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(89.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Hep B Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
Hep B Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
96.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(92.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(94.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Varicella Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
Varicella Vaccination Rate: Kindergarten Students County: Pima
96.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(94.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Hospitalization Rate due to Heat-related Illness County: Pima
Hospitalization Rate due to Heat-related Illness County: Pima
35.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Access to Care
Persons with Health Insurance: All Ages County: Pima
Persons with Health Insurance: All Ages County: Pima
92.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona state value.
US Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Persons with Health Insurance: Unemployed County: Pima
Persons with Health Insurance: Unemployed County: Pima
81.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(78.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona state value.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Children with Health Insurance County: Pima
Children with Health Insurance County: Pima
94.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(92.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 19-64 County: Pima
Adults with Health Insurance: 19-64 County: Pima
88.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(87.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Health Insurance: 65+ County: Pima
Persons with Health Insurance: 65+ County: Pima
99.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(99.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona state value.
US Value
(99.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Mental Health Shortage Areas County: Pima
Mental Health Shortage Areas County: Pima
30
Mental Health HPSAs
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(30)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Primary Care Shortage Areas County: Pima
Primary Care Shortage Areas County: Pima
22
Primary Care HPSAs
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(34)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Individual Health Status
Self-Reported General Health Status: Good or Better County: Pima
Self-Reported General Health Status: Good or Better County: Pima
83.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(83.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Self-Reported General Health Status: Fair or Poor County: Pima
Self-Reported General Health Status: Fair or Poor County: Pima
16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Pima
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Pima
546.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(554.4)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(567.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Pima
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Pima
192.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
AZ Value
(224.1)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(202.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Pima
Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Pima
26.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(17.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Premature Mortality
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls County: Pima
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls County: Pima
12.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(11.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions County: Pima
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions County: Pima
16.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 15 Arizona counties.
AZ Value
(17.5)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Accidental Overdose County: Pima
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Accidental Overdose County: Pima
40.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(37.9)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(30.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer County: Pima
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer County: Pima
227.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(131.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(144.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(205.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cardiovascular Disease County: Pima
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cardiovascular Disease County: Pima
338.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
AZ Value
(203.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Arizona State value.
US Value
(210.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(310.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
